Nevada Gambling Hypocrisy On Parade

Here are a couple of recent stories that highlight the hypocrisy that arises when you deal with an industry that has a strong regulatory component.  These stories are in addition to my recent post regarding casino heavy hitters fighting each other over expanded gambling, which you can see here. 

The first story details the news that Nevada's senators (one Democrat, one Republican) are teaming up to introduce a bill to outlaw all online gambling in the US except for poker.  Why?  Because they are trying to stop the "wild West" of gambling.  You see, yes they are doing this to protect their Nevada casinos, but you shouldn't only think of their more noble motives of protecting YOU from evil gambling.  As you of course may realize, Nevada only offers good and pure gambling...so that's OK and should be protected.

This bill is going to be bi-partisan because, let's be clear, the Democrat, Harry Reid, isn't very popular among Republicans, which is probably an understatement.  He needs his fellow Nevada senator, a Republican, to help weasel this bill through.  Of course, the bill would also have to get through the House of Representatives, but one step at a time.

My view is that this bill shouldn't get through the Senate, but it indeed may.  When?  After the November elections during Congress' lame duck session.  This bill will be inserted into another bill that due to its content would be deemed a "must pass" bill.  Think of something like a bill to authorize the budget for the armed forces, or removing a tax impediment for disabled elderly people.  No one will stop those bills, so Harry Reid as Senate Majority Leader will add this bill to that one and force people to vote for this or they will be viewed as hating old people, the military, etc.  Watch for the news on this bill to go very quiet until after the election, then watch these lame duck bills come up in November and December.  The article on this bill can be found here.

Now, where's the hypocrisy?  Well the Nevada view that their gambling is good and everyone else's is bad is hypocritical, but let's add in the other story to buttress the hypocrisy.  This story discusses how Nevada regulators are allowing slot players to use prepaid access cards.  Now similar means are used for sportsbook and poker players, but doing this with slots isn't exactly the same.  It would take some time for a sportsbook player to place their wagers, similar with a player in a poker game.  Slot machines are fast.  You can get a new spin about every 6 seconds if you're fast enough.  Also, sports betting and poker have a skill component, where a slot machine does not.

Here's a quote from the article:

"Here’s how it would work: A player who wants to use an access card in a slot machine would first have to register at a casino with identification that verifies a player’s address and date of birth. Registration would also tie a player to a casino’s loyalty card. Players could then load the cards at their banks by transferring funds from a checking or savings account.  Harry Hagerty, president and chief financial officer of Sightline, said his company’s agreement with banks puts limitations on the amount of money that a player could load to an access card — a maximum of $2,000 a day, $4,500 a week and $10,000 a month, and the most a player could put on a card at any time is $25,000.  Regulators also said a player wouldn’t be able to use the card for at least 15 minutes after transferring the funds."

Wow, very responsible of Nevada to make sure the maximum on a card is $25,000 and they have a whole FIFTEEN MINUTE cooling off period. (sarcasm alert)

Here's the Nevada hypocrisy.  One the one hand, they want to make it easier for people to spend their money on slot machines, ahem, THEIR slot machines, which they must think is a good thing.  On the other hand, they are seeking to pass a federal law to outlaw online slot machines, because those are generally not Nevada slot machines, which of course must be assumed to be bad.

So, in essence, NO NO NO don't put your money in those non-Nevada slot machines because they are bad and evil because they are electronic and online and you could go through your money very fast.  Put your money in our slot machines because we're pure and decent and we limit the money you have on your prepaid card to $25,000 dollars!  Right, I stand corrected thinking about this...no hypocrisy here!  (sarcasm alert)

New Tribal Casino Near San Francisco Offers Close Alternative to Nevada Casinos

Nevada casinos have been facing the threat from California tribal gaming for years.  Having a large property within an hour's drive from San Francisco ups this by a couple of notches.  The San Francisco area has around 11 million people.  Having a large gaming property within a 60-90 minute drive can not be good news to Lake Tahoe and Reno casino properties.

The Casino Journal reports "after years of planning and 16 months of construction, Graton Resort & Casino officially opened its doors to the public earlier this week. The $800‐million facility is the closest full‐service casino to the Bay Area, and ushers in a new level of sophistication and excitement to Northern California."  The property will have 3,000 slot machines and almost 150 table games, along with over a dozen restaurants.  This is a big operation and will definitely draw, in my opinion.

What is new is that with this property near San Francisco, this property might draw customers that would have traveled to other Northern California tribal casinos.  A previous post regarding a tribal property near a large metro area is here.  Do not be surprised if more tribes will attempt to build facilities as close as possible to the major population centers.  That effort might run into trouble with regard to on/off reservation regulations regarding properties, historical lands and the like, but with so much money in gambling, the trend is set.  Another post regarding tribal casino economic impact can be found here and a post highlighting the strong competition California tribal gaming is to Nevada casinos is here.

I've discussed earlier what Reno and Lake Tahoe casinos could do to combat this threat.  It is controversial in nature, but desperate threats could make controversial solutions more palatable.  To learn about what Nevada casinos could do to differentiate themselves from California casinos, read this post.

Atlantic City Gambling Revenue Takes Hit

Test Test Test

Bloomberg reports that Atlantic City gambling revenue fell 12% in September 2010 from September 2009 levels. Gambling revenue was $2.8 billion in the first 3 quarters of 2010, which was almost 9% less than the same period in 2009.

The economy is definitely a factor, but the impact of competition must be looked at as the primary factor for reduced gaming revenue. Surrounding states such as Delaware, New York and Pennsylvania have increased their gambling offerings for their local populations. No need to travel to Atlantic City if the gambler can play close to home.

Atlantic City needs to prevail in New Jersey's efforts to allow sports betting to provide the competitive differentiator to bring back this destination. Otherwise, the long term trend for Atlantic City may not look promising.

See previous posts on New Jersey sports betting here, here and here. The posts discuss New Jersey's efforts and surveys with regard to establishing sports betting and overturning PASPA.

California Tribal Gaming Now Even More Competitive with Northern Nevada Casinos

This blog has discussed the threat to Reno and Tahoe casinos from California-based tribal gaming properties. The key advantage of the tribal casinos is that the tribal properties are much closer to the California population centers than Reno and Lake Tahoe. The New York Times has an article that highlights the proximity advantage as well as the upgrading of the tribal facilities to become more full-amenity hotel casinos.

I've posted a similar sentiment to the Times article a few months back. That post can be found here. The most controversial post on this blog regarding the topic can be found here. Specifically what do Reno and Lake Tahoe do to combat full-amenity tribal hotel casinos that are located much closer to California cities? In the last referenced post, I discussed that Nevada casinos may need to exploit the two things they can offer that California casinos can't - sports betting and legal brothels. Sports betting probably won't generate the level of revenue to make up for lost slot revenue, but legal brothels may be enough of a differentiator to pull sufficient traffic to the Reno and Lake Tahoe properties to hold their own. Right now, Reno and Lake Tahoe are hurting to the tune of a 25% decrease in gaming revenue since 2007.

The article describes that Reno properties are becoming more akin to the casinos that cater to the locals market, similar to how Stations Casinos operate their Las Vegas properties. The problem is that there may be too much casino capacity in Reno compared to the approximately 250,000 population base. In addition, the locations of the various Reno properties are not as well positioned as the suburban-located properties in the Las Vegas area.